International Logistics - Tate and Lyle Report Essay

International Logistics - Tate and Lyle Report - Essay Example Logistics or supply chain management is based upon two core perspectives. The first idea is based upon the fact that the end product used by the users is the effort of numerous organisations. In this context, the term organisation is referred as supply chain. The second perspective has been the fact that although the supply chain has been inexistence since a long period of time, most of the organisations have not paid due attention towards it and few businesses who have understood the importance of the supply chain have not managed it in a proper way. Therefore, this has led to disorganized and ineffective supply chain. From these two perspectives, supply chain management can be explained as the management of the supply chain activities for the purpose of maximising the value of the customers and thus achieve competitive advantages. Supply chain management tries to demonstrate the efforts made for the purpose of developing and operating a profitable supply chain in the best possible way. It is worthy of mentioning that supply chain management encompasses broad range of the activities such as development of the product, sourcing, production along with logistics and the Information Technology (IT) that assist in synchronisation of these activities. The firms that tend to make up the supply chain are found to be interrelated via physical flow and information flow. Information flows assist the partners of the supply chain to integrate long-term plans and thus monitor the day-to-day flow of the goods, up and down the supply chain. While on the other hand, the physical flow is concerned with the transformation along with movement, storage of the goods as well as services (Handfield, 2011). The report is about the worldwide supply chain management of Tate & Lyle which is one of the providers of distinct and competent ingredients to numerous sectors such as food, beverage as well as other industries. Since the company has a large manufacturing plant and innovative tech nology, the company is capable of turning the raw materials into competent materials for its customers (Tate & Lyle, 2011). The most innovative tool that the companies can use for the purpose of improving the logistics as well as the Supply Chain Management (SCM) processes is considered to be the electronic procurement. It is the electronic procurement that assists the companies to get rid of the challenges that the industry faces on the regular basis. Through the electronic procurement system the goods and the services can be bought online. It is via electronic business that the procurement process is converted online and thus all the geographically dispersed employees tend to coordinate online (Kothari & Et. Al., 2005). It can be mentioned that for applying the e-procurement solution, great deal of money is required. In the recent times, most of industries are trying to focus upon the cost

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Essay Example The situation was similar to the initial years of World War II when Germany was annexing one country after another without any equitable resistance. Had not America dropped the two atomic bombs, in all likelihood, the war could have continued for weeks or months, adding to the miseries worldwide. Except for Russia, European powers had almost come to a standstill. The involvement of Russia in Japan had America not dropped the bombs, could easily have made the conflict bloodier and more widespread. It is debatable whether so many lives could have been lost had Russia invaded Japan. However, it is certain the conflict could have dragged on longer in such an eventuality. While other powers of the Axis viz, Germany and Italy had been vanquished, the battle with Japan was far from over. Japan was holding to ransom the rest of the world through its brazen show of power. Nothing seemed to hold the Japanese march. In spite of suffering reverses, Japan held on and was in no hurry to surrender. The Japanese juggernaut was so strong that it held most of Far East Asia. However, at the closing stage, Japan was losing its grip although it was not ready to admit defeat. Japan was given enough time and incentive to surrender. The Potsdam Proclamation issued on July 26, 1945, was very clear about the ramifications in the event of no surrender. The ultimatum declared, "We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction" (Bill Gordon, 2000). But Japan did not surrender. The Japanese, or those at the helm in Japan, were in no mood to listen. They may have been materially demolished, but mentally they had enough capacity to fight on. It took two atomic bombs and a week later, Japan surrendered and that too on the prompting of the emperor. I am not condoning the horrors of the atomic bombs. America had other alternatives besides the atomic bombs. But it is debatable if these alternatives could have worked and produced the same results that the atomic bombs did. The alternatives were these: "(1) use in manner most effective from a military point of view to bring about prompt Japanese surrender while minimizing the loss of American lives, (2) give military demonstration to Japan with opportunity for surrender before full use of weapon, (3) give experimental demonstration in this country with opportunity for surrender before full use of weapon, (4) do not use militarily but make public the experimental results, or (5) maintain as secret as possible and refrain from using the bombs in the war. President Truman chose alternative 1, even though only 15 percent of the scientists supported it" (Bill Gordon, 2000). President Truman's choice of alternative 1 was at best akin to mercy killing. However beastly this alternative might have appeared, it is difficult to fathom the efficacy of any other alternative. Japan needed a live demonstration. Even after the atomic bombs were dropped Japan dithered on the decision to surrender. It was only at the intervention of the Japanese